For almost fifty years; Sources of Japanese Tradition has been the single most valuable collection of English-language readings on Japan. Unrivalled in its wide selection of source materials on history; society; politics; education; philosophy; and religion; the two-volume textbook is a crucial resource for students; scholars; and readers seeking an introduction to Japanese civilization. Originally published in a single hardcover book; Volume 2 is now available as an abridged; two-part paperback. Part 1 covers the Tokugawa period to 1868; including texts that address the spread of neo-Confucianism and Buddhism and the initial encounters of Japan and the West. Part 2 begins with the Meiji period and ends at the new millennium; shedding light on such major movements as the Enlightenment; constitutionalism; nationalism; socialism; and feminism; and the impact of the postwar occupation. Commentary by major scholars and comprehensive bibliographies and indexes are included.Together; these readings map out the development of modern Japanese civilization and illuminate the thought and teachings of its intellectual; political; and religious leaders.
#827033 in Books Robert O Paxton 2001-09-15Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 8.24 x 1.25 x 5.50l; 1.22 #File Name: 0231124694438 pagesVichy France Old Guard and New Order
Review
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. A good introduction for the English speaking to the history of the German occupation of France and the Vichy governmentBy Central TexasIn my opinion a very interesting; informative; and useful book. Like many Americans; I have scant knowledge of the workings of French politics and government save to note that; much as we continue to rehash our civil war; the French re-litigate the revolution of 1789. Paxton does and excellent job of putting into perspective who; why; how and when the French civilian population collaborated/survived/resisted the German invasion and occupation from 1940-45. He dissects the various political and social groups at the outbreak of hostilities; their various reactions; and the ways in which the Vichy government came to be a vehicle for the French right to attack their enemies of the center and left. In so doing; they also increasingly collaborated with the Nazi regime; often leading rather than being forced into acts against some portions of the French population.The book was written some time ago (Kindle does not see fit to reproduce the copyrights; so my memory is that it was published around 1971) and is largely based on research in German archives which are available; rather than the French which were largely closed for a 70 year period. It is difficult to avoid the impression that the French archives were closed because a large number of French politicians and civil servants who continued in office; post-war; would have been compromised by their contents. There may now be better books; at least in French; that address this period after access to French archives.Some of the book is slow going. A political system with dozens of splintering; rejoining; and relabeling parties is difficult for a non expert to keep straight. It may help to review an overview of the French government; at least to the point of understanding the relationship of President; Parliament; Prime Minister and the standing bureaucracy that supports them.The Resistance is a small part of the book as it was a relatively small part of the story of France during the occupation. Paxton does make plain that Vichy government fought the French Resistance with as much or more ferocity as did the Germans. For an interesting window into one family's experience in the resistance; The Cost of Courage by Charles Kaiser is a good read. Kaiser is not a particularly gifted writer; IMO; but does graphically outline the risks; costs; and consequences of joining the resistance.3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. A Wonderful Piece of WW II Scholarship of Surprising Relevance 75 Yrs LaterBy BartlebyPaxton demonstrates a command of all available materials as he dismantles what was the conventional wisdom; prior to the initial publication of this book in 1972; that Vichy shielded the French from the German occupiers. He carefully weighs the evidence before concluding that Vichy leaders; who were mostly traditionalists; were culpable on various counts; but perhaps mostly for their attempted use of leverage with the German occupiers to defeat their domestic opponents. Time and time again; Vichy leaders; especially Laval; proposed that the "New France" assume a role in the "New Europe" that Hitler was forging. And; time and time again; Hitler and von Ribbentrop dismissed these proposals out of hand.Although Paxton lays out his portrait of Vichy in great detail; he leaves it to the reader to connect the dots. Numerous times; I closed the book and thought about a point that he had just raised. For instance; I have long posited the freedom-loving US; Britain; and the Resistance as the happy middle; surrounded by totalitarian communists in the form of the Soviet Union and totalitarian fascists in the form of Nazi Germany. But the Vichy traditionalists posited the US and the Soviet at the extremes along the freedom continuum; but yoked by urges to reduce men and women to units of production and to wield hegemonic power in the post-imperial era ushered in by the end of WW II. Hmm.At the very end of the book; Paxton constructs a "moral balance sheet." The ultimate driver of the Vichy leaders was their fear of social disorder as the highest evil. Commoners among the occupied; as well as the occupiers; made peace with men of evil to maintain a degree of normalcy in their lives. In the final paragraph; Paxton addresses the reader directly; noting that readers; as well as the author; will not identify with these commoners; but will instead be tempted to identify with the Resistance; assuring themselves that they too would have resisted. But Paxton warns that we are far more likely to have acted like the Vichy majority. He then sets the hook in the final three sentences of the book:"Indeed; it may be the German occupiers rather than the Vichy majority whom Americans; as residents of the most powerful state on earth; should scrutinize most unblinkingly. The deeds of occupier and occupied alike suggest that there come cruel times when to save a nation's deeper values one must disobey the state. France after 1940 was one of those times."Written in the early 1970s; these words alluded to the US occupation of SE Asia. In the introduction to the 2001 edition; Paxton admits that some of his judgments about Vichy were colored by his "loathing" of the Vietnam War. The frightening thought is that; over 40 yrs later; this paragraph is as applicable today to our occupation of Iraq; Syria; and Afghanistan. Understanding the Vichy experience; we can begin to ask what Vichy dilemmas have we; the occupiers; imposed on these occupied peoples.3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. Vichy France: What the French will never tell you.By Carmen ScullVery good information on the early period of the Vichy regime that I think has never been covered. Did you the know the French bombed Gilbralter? The Vichy regime ws absolutely begging to be aligned with Germany to split up the British colonies after Germany won the war with France's help. The Germans were not interested. Fascinating!!!! Carmen Scull